We provide translator patterns, assurance paths and deployment guidance so that institutions can keep operating under their current governance — and still connect.
Design of message-to-message and message-to-canonical translators (e.g. institutional formats → interoperability format → target format).
Interoperability patterns for inter-institution settlement, mirrored reporting, and public-interest systems where multiple operators must reconcile against each other.
Outputs are audit-aligned and can be shared with assurance teams.
Controls, logs and message structures can be exposed to regulators or internal audit without exposing other participants.
We shape integrations to fit existing oversight rather than forcing institutions to adopt an external platform policy.
Where possible, data stays with the originating party or its designated processor. Interlayer provides the “how”, not a data silo.
We support controlled deployments inside institutional environments — including containerised/Kubernetes-style labs — so that the interoperability logic runs where the institution already has security, logging and change control.
This aligns with the operating stance described on the governance page: sovereign-neutral, UK-anchored today, Swiss alignment planned.
Institutions retain operational sovereignty, while still conforming to the same translator logic as their counterparties.
Identity, compliance, supply-chain and registry alignment can be added when a counterpart or programme requires it.
For multilateral or public-interest programmes, we can package translator logic and governance notes together.
We only expose what is needed for the engagement. No public onboarding, no unnecessary telemetry.
If you need to validate whether an existing system can interoperate under your current governance, or you need a translator defined for a specific counterpart, reach out.